<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pet Peeve: How to handle an overflowing in-box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.etiquettedaily.com/2010/02/pet-peeve-how-to-handle-an-overflowing-in-box/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.etiquettedaily.com/2010/02/pet-peeve-how-to-handle-an-overflowing-in-box/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:07:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Berenson</title>
		<link>http://www.etiquettedaily.com/2010/02/pet-peeve-how-to-handle-an-overflowing-in-box/#comment-1947</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Berenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etiquettedaily.com/?p=2109#comment-1947</guid>
		<description>In a similar situation I &#039;retaliated&#039; by being inconsistent.  I created a file within my email  and sorted all the mail from her into this file- and then browse through it when I have time (often days later).  I respond the same way with unwanted text messages-- It only seems takes one email or text message of &quot;importance&quot; (as defined by the sender) to not get replied to for them to figure out that this isn&#039;t the best method of communicating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a similar situation I &#8216;retaliated&#8217; by being inconsistent.  I created a file within my email  and sorted all the mail from her into this file- and then browse through it when I have time (often days later).  I respond the same way with unwanted text messages&#8211; It only seems takes one email or text message of &#8220;importance&#8221; (as defined by the sender) to not get replied to for them to figure out that this isn&#8217;t the best method of communicating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.etiquettedaily.com/2010/02/pet-peeve-how-to-handle-an-overflowing-in-box/#comment-1946</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etiquettedaily.com/?p=2109#comment-1946</guid>
		<description>Many offices have policies against using your work e-mail address for personal business.  I have often replied simply, &quot;This address is meant for business only.  Please use xx(at)gmail.com for personal messages.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many offices have policies against using your work e-mail address for personal business.  I have often replied simply, &#8220;This address is meant for business only.  Please use xx(at)gmail.com for personal messages.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

