Invitation Inquiry: Whose parents go on your wedding invitations?

by EPI Staff on November 10, 2009

Q: My parents are paying for my wedding, so I thought it was proper to use only their names on the invitation.  My fiance, Henry, agreed.  Now his parents are wondering why their names have been left out.  What should I do?

A: Don’t worry.  What you did is absolutely correct, given that your parents are the hosts.  Henry’s folks may have seen invitations issued jointly by two sets of parents, perhaps because both sides are paying or because there are stepparents involved.  Whatever their reason for being upset, all you need to do in response is be especially thoughtful of them in the months to come.

{ 42 comments… read them below or add one }

Lulu K. November 9, 2009 at 9:52 pm

Um, excuse me… it should be WHOSE, and INVITATION.

Reply

Daniel Post Senning November 13, 2009 at 4:13 am

Feeling a bit sheepish here, thank you.

Reply

Jay Remer November 12, 2009 at 5:27 pm

As with any invitation, the host’s name customarily goes on the invitation. Traditionally the bride’s parents host the wedding. Today’s weddings can present us with a variety of different scenarios, but the guidelines remain the same.

Reply

M.K. Klippel January 22, 2010 at 4:11 pm

I understand the parents of the bride hosting the wedding being the only name of the couple to be put on the invitation but… I feel it makes it look like parents of the groom are not supporting the uniting of the couple and grooms family is not asking family and friends to join. I’m embarassed and hurt that our names were not included as “parents of”. It’s my sons wedding too, not just the bride and her parents’. Bride planned a $5000.00 rehearsal dinner that we’re paying for, why are we not considered part of the hosts. The wedding is far away from us so there will be a big expense for travel, etc. Bride and groom also expect a nice reception in our hometown a few months after wedding for the many of those who can’t travel the distance. Lots of $$ for that too. I really am feeling crushed that the invitation does not have our name as he IS our son and we are doing a lot for them for the wedding.

Reply

Graceandhonor January 22, 2010 at 7:30 pm

This is an instance where hundreds of years of tradition are in play; tradition dictates that the bulk of expense for the wedding day itself is borne by the bride’s family, as in your case it is. It is certainly gracious of you to foot the bill for the rehearsal dinner, and tradition does dictate this as the obligation of the groom’s family; you, as the hosts should be the ones planning and deciding the budget for it and invitations to it should note you are the hosts. You are under no traditional obligation to host a later reception, but if you are, this is your chance to incorporate wording as you wish that states you are hosting this for your son and his bride.

The tradition of not naming the groom’s parents on a wedding invitation is (in addition to the fact the bride’s parents are usually the paying hosts) based upon the assumption a man capable of becoming a husband is independent of his parents and does not need their permission to do so, nor their monetary backing. The idea of a rehearsal dinner is the modern equivalent of an ancient welcoming dinner given in honor of a bride and those accompanying her to the wedding who may have never met the groom’s family prior to the marriage and the expense was shouldered by his proud parents, intent on proving they were an affluent and cultured lot. (This is where the notion of inviting out-of-town guests to the rehearsal dinner also originates.) And, it was assumed that if the groom was happy with his choice of bride, then his family was most certainly rejoicing in his happiness.

Tradition aside, some couples today are opting for the contemporary practice of listing the groom’s parents on the invitation, but in most cases, this also means his parents are paying for the privilege by contributing even more to the wedding expense. Perhaps it is not too late for you to discuss the viability of this with your son.

As in everything, we need to carefully consider what we wish for, as the realization of it is often a shock.

Reply

Barb May 1, 2010 at 10:20 am

Just got the same shock. We as parents of the groom are not on the invitation. We are paying for the photographer, florist, limo’s, dj and rehersal. How do I approach this without causing a rift?

Reply

Graceandhonor May 1, 2010 at 11:05 am

The time to have discussed your role and expectations (with your son) would have been during discussion of your financial participation. He then should have spoken with the bride and her parents and her parents should have contacted you thanking you for your financial assistance and stating you would be listed on the invitation. It is puzzling that her parents did not do this in view of your substantial contribution, but at this point, try to put that aside and be gracious for the sake of your son’s happiness. At the appropriate time, in view of your level of assistance, I don’t think it would be a bad thing to tell your son you were disappointed. But, do this with caution, as you don’t want to taint the happy memories for him. I hope her parents do profusely thank you for your help at some point during the wedding event, or certainly afterward. If they don’t, certainly the bride and groom should. In any event, just know you’ve done all you have out of deep, selfless love for your son.

Reply

Brittany May 7, 2011 at 6:00 pm

I completely agree with Grace & Honor. My in-laws felt this same way, and I just wanted to tell them so many times, “It’s not about YOU!” It’s the bride’s family inviting guests to the wedding of their daughter, to an independent, self-sustaining man. It doesn’t matter if you’ve paid for a few select things. I understand that it’s nice that you did that, but why worry about something so trivial as your name on an invitation that will, for most guests, be thrown in the trash after the wedding? I think that those of you that are complaining about your name not on the invitation need to be a bit more excited about the MARRIAGE, not the wedding.

That said, as Grace and Honor mentioned, if you wished for your names to be included on the invitation, a discussion with your son should have taken place long before the invitations were sent out.

M. Hunter February 10, 2010 at 9:25 pm

Be thankful that you have parents! My fiance has never been married, and I have. He’s a lovely man and would like to share our day with others, and not have a toned down affair. So, the wedding will be in his hometown. Our problem is that both of our fathers have passed away, and my mother recently passed away, also. We both want to honor our parents, dead and alive, as they were a major factor in our growth. Since I will be paying for the most of the wedding, I have no problem with our names as “hosts”, but we still want to include our parents’ names. Suggestions, anyone?

Reply

Rusty Shackleford February 18, 2010 at 8:43 am

I would say: “bride”, daughter of the late x and x to “groom”, son of the Y and the late Y invite you to their wedding. Particularly if you are having a wedding where your guests will mingle with each other, you don’t want to create an awkward moment where someone might mistake another guest for one of your late parents. I also think this is a tactful way to resolve the question of your parents before the wedding so that you may approach the subject on your special day as you please. You don’t want the subject of your parents to come up at your wedding at a moment when you are not prepared.

Reply

Sharon May 13, 2010 at 5:24 pm

Our son is getting married and the aunt’s and uncle’s asked to give them a brunch the day after the wedding. The person taking the lead has received feedback from other family members that they can only afford no more than a specific amount and now the per-person rate has gone over the amount.

We, groom’s parents, are more than happy to help out and make up the difference.

Questions:
1. While awkward for the lead host, is it still OK to list all hosts as if they provided an equal $$ share for the event?
2.. Groom’s parents would like to remain as anonymous contributors. Is that tacky and another awkward position for the lead host? We can keep a secret…:)

Reply

Graceandhonor May 15, 2010 at 1:06 pm

All hosts, regardless of percentage, should be listed equally; your guests should not know who paid what. If you can make your offer of contributing without public acknowledgment in such a way as won’t offend the hosts, then do so. As for timing, will the wedding couple not be on their honeymoon the day after they are married?

Reply

Sharon May 16, 2010 at 3:31 am

Thank you – actually they are leaving later that day. Thanks again for the advice.

Reply

Player Profiles October 30, 2010 at 4:56 am

Best you could edit the webpage title Invitation Inquiry: Whose parents go on your wedding invitations? to something more generic for your content you make. I loved the the writing yet.

Reply

Heather Belmonte May 31, 2011 at 8:07 am

My fiance’s mother refused to pay for ANYTHING stating, “It’s not my wedding, why should I have to pay for yours.” Now she is upset that her name was not placed onto the invitations. She has now returned her invite stating that she is not coming. What do I do?

Reply

Elizabeth May 31, 2011 at 9:25 am

It should be said that parents are not obligated to pay for any wedding costs. If you are hosting your own wedding (ie, paying for it) then it makes sense to word your invitation to indicate that.

Since this is your fiance’s mother, you should let him deal with her – it is not really your place to fight these battles, nor is it as effective for you to do so. I hope you both are able to sort out this relationship and have a happy wedding with whoever chooses to come!

Reply

Betsi July 4, 2011 at 1:26 pm

While I realize this question doesn’t “best represent the most common concerns of [the Etiquette Daily] readers,” it is related to whose names are listed on the invite. My deceased mother left me some money specifically to help fund my wedding. Doesn’t that technically make her one of the hosts? I’ve seen myriad suggestions/opinions/”rules”/etc. on listing (or not listing) a deceased parent, but I feel the wedding-specific inheritance adds a twist to my situation. Personally, I like the idea of a superscript cross next to my mother’s name on the invitation and/or an appropriate tribute to her in the program.

Reply

Alicia July 5, 2011 at 6:57 am

Hosting is more then just paying for the wedding but actuially greeting and attending to the comfort of guests. As she is descesed she can not be a host. It will cause more disconcernment then pleasure to have your mom listed as hosting in addition several on the groom side or others who do not know are likely to be looking for and asking about why your mom was not at the wedding despite hosting and then feel foolish and sad when they find out at your wedding that she is passed away. Do not list her as a hostess as there is more to being a good hostess then money.
In your case I would do the style of invitation that is
You are invited to the wedding of
Betsi Ann
daughter of John Smith and the late Sarah Smith
joining in marriage with
John Adam Doe
son of Fawn and Stag Doe
on day month year
at time oclock
at some location
in some town and state

Reply

Mrs. Czeisel July 5, 2011 at 12:04 pm

Here’s the Emily Post wording for one deceased parent:

Mr. [Mrs.] Arthur Watson Driscoll
requests the honour of your presence
at the marriage of his [her] daughter
Susan Patricia
to
Mr. Drew Randolph Morris
Saturday, the seventeenth of May
two thousand eleven
at two o’clock
New Haven Community Church
New Haven, Georgia

Alicia is right that hosting is not related to money.

http://www.emilypost.com/weddings/wedding-invitations-and-announcements/337-formal-wedding-invitation-variations-and-samples

Reply

Betsi July 6, 2011 at 12:23 am

Thank you for your feedback. Your posts make perfect sense and are much appreciated.

Reply

Judy July 12, 2011 at 1:13 pm

I just needed to put my opinion in. My (the bride’s) parents paid for the entire reception. My husband’s parents gave us a monetary gift which we put towards some expenses (photo, limo). My parents paid a GREAT deal more than his towards everything – but we listed ALL parents as hosts of the day. My parents did not feel that the invite should be a playbill of who paid for what. And all response cards were addressed to my parents – so that signifies who is “in charge” of the event so to speak. In addition, it is 2011 – women are more than self-sustainable and I was not “given away” but rather two families were joined together. Many of my friends listed the bride’s parents as “host” at the top of the invite and listed the groom’s parents under his name as “son of”. That might be a solution to many of these sticky situations – but in my opinion, this just seems a little caddy and tacky. This appears as if the bride’s parent’s want top billing – when that is NOT what the day should be about.

Reply

Eileen July 12, 2011 at 2:38 pm

My parents paid for my brothers ENTIRE wedding. Church, limo, reception, flowers invitations, wedding gown you name it . Not to mention rehearsal dinner and paying for out of town guests. Guess what the BRIDES parents names went on the invitation not the grooms. They were more than happy to let it go and not get hung up on having their name on the invitation. The grooms parents need to get over themselves and realize the wedding is really a celebration for the couple!!!!

Reply

Joan September 28, 2011 at 5:09 am

I’ve been married for 4 years now and I feel its right to share a bit of my persona experience with the wedding invitation sutff. I live on a small Island where, traditionally both sets of parents pay for the wedding expenses but I, being a working, independant woman, saved money from my salaries for my wedding while my husband expected his father (his mom doesn’t work) to pay for his share of the wedding expenses.
Now what happened is that a few years before the wedding (we dated 8 years before getting married), my father in law started having an affair with a girl twenty years younger who ripped him off of his savings, you get the picture. One year before the wedding, my Husband talked to me about postponing it because of this, I refused saying I’m not going to pay for anyone’s fault, we put our efforts together, he quickly saved money for one year like I did, we put everything in one account and did all the wedding expenses from that account.
Our wedding invitation said: “Justin and Joan together with their parents have the pleasure to invite you…” We paid for our wedding, my FIL nearly caused it to be postponed so I left out all the parents’ names on the invitation (to be fair), till today I didn’t hear a thing about it. Tradition is ok as long as it does not become ridiculous and outdated. In this modern era I think it is up to the bride and groom to decide.

Reply

Winifred Rosenburg September 28, 2011 at 10:19 am

Who pays and who hosts are separate things. Therefore, all the issues about who paid should have no effect on the invitation wording.

Reply

Mother of the Groom January 18, 2012 at 4:34 pm

I received my son’s wedding invitation in the mail and it is worded like this:
Mr. and Mrs. Bride’s Parents Names
request the honor or your presence at the wedding of our daughter
Bride’s First Name to Groom’s First Name
Date
Time
Place
Reception to Follow
I don’t really care that our names were not on the invitation, but the Bride and Groom’s names were not spelled out and it leaves the question in my mind of “Groom who?”
Am I wrong to think this is tacky? I feel very hurt that his full name was not on the invitation and he said that anyone invited should know who they are….but that’s not my point! His wedding invitation doesn’t even has his full name AND the Bride’s parents have a different last name than she does so to me that is confusing to people who we invited because they don’t know what her last name is either.
Your opinion please!!!

Reply

Country Girl January 18, 2012 at 7:34 pm

I definitely understand your frustration! You are correct it is really confusing and strange to leave the Bride and Groom’s full names off. Most especially if they have semi-common names. I can’t tell you how many “Dave and Ashley”s, or “Joe and Michelle”s I know, and (unless your son Bucksnort is marrying his fiance Lalalina) there is a big chance that guests will have to rack their brains trying to figure out to whose wedding they’ve been invited.

Since the invitations seem to have already been printed and distributed, there is obviously nothing that can be done about them now. And even though invitations and their wording are the choice of the bride and groom, you have a legitimate worry that friends and family members could be terribly confused. I would suggest to your son that he call all of those on his side to confirm that they received HIS wedding invitation. Let the bride-to-be deal with the confusion on her side. If you are contacted by any of these guests “We got an invitation to a Rick and Jill’s wedding, is that your son?” I would be sure to pass the message along and let you son know that guests are bewildered.

Reply

Ashleigh January 19, 2012 at 12:52 pm

A bit OT but excellent name choices!! LOL!! I think “bucksnort” could accurately describe the noise I just made trying not to laugh hysterically in the middle of the office. :)

Reply

Elizabeth January 18, 2012 at 8:46 pm

MOG – the invitation you describe is strange, indeed. I can understand your feelings on behalf of your son (and future DIL – if I were her, I’d be peeved, too!). However, what’s done is done, and any complaining can only have negative consequences. Either this is something your DIL and son knew about ahead of time and were OK with or, if not, then it is a prompt for them to take a greater hand in the planning of their own wedding. I can’t imagine not seeing and proofing my own invitations before they went to print. What does the couple think about all this??

Reply

Winifred Rosenburg January 18, 2012 at 11:29 pm

You are right that the groom’s full name is normally used on invitations so recipients on the groom’s side aren’t left wondering “John who?” I haven’t seen a rule regarding use of the bride’s last name, but it would make sense to me to use it if it isn’t obvious based on her parents’ names. I don’t know if I would call their invitation tacky, but it is confusing.

Reply

Bride to be April 8, 2013 at 5:59 pm

Bride to be:

I was completing my invitations by myself because my mother was 30 minutes late to the apointment with my calligrapher. I had everything pretty much completed where my parents were listed as the host and my groom’s parents names were on the invites after his name (AKA: Groom son of Mr. and Mrs. Groom’s last name). The calligrapher was helping me out with the wording since I had no experience. My mother walked in 30 minutes late (as usual) and started reading the invitations. I could tell imediately she was not happy with something. In a flustered voice she told me that his parents name’s should not be on the invite since my parents are the ones hosting. Since she was the one footing the bill for the invitations, the Calligrapher imetiately backed her up saying it is tradition that only the bride’s parents are mentioned since they are paying for everything except the tuxedos and the rehearsal dinner. Without my liking they completely disregarded my wish to have the groom’s parent’s names on the invites.

About 2 months later when we get the invites sent out I realize the the groom’s parents were very hurt by their names not being on the invite. This is after I have already sent out the invites and the RSVP by date has past.

I feel bad and I love them like family but to be honest, my family is droping over $20,000 for the wedding and my groom’s budget to my knowledge in under $2,000 for the rehearsal. I don’t care about how much they are spending but it is clear that my parents are 100% the Host of our wedding.

I showed my groom a preview of the invitations before everything was set in stone and he said everything looked good. I think he was too busy to notice or something because when he finally found out that his parent’s names were not on the invites from his mother sobbing over the phone about how a family friend called to inform them their names were not on them, he all of a sudden was mad at me for the invites. If I had to do it over again, I would have faught my mom a little more on the discussion. I just thought since the calligrapher was agreeing with her that mabe it was proper. It is deffinently not woth ruining a relationship with your future in laws over.

Reply

Elizabeth April 9, 2013 at 9:35 am

Including the groom’s parents’ names on the invitation does not imply that they are hosting, especially if the wording is like this:

Sally and John Smith request the honor of your presence at the wedding of their daughter, Sadie, to David Black, son of Mary and James Black.

This kind of wording clearly indicates that the bride’s parents are doing the inviting (and the hosting) without leaving off the groom’s parents.

I should also add that “hosting” and “paying for” are not the same thing. Both parents should equally play “host” since many family and friends will come from both sides. How the wedding is paid for is another matter entirely. Some couples pay for their own wedding but still list their parents as hosts.

Since the groom did OK the invitations (he didn’t think of his parents either), you should both apologize to his parents, describe the matter as both of your faults (which it was), and ask forgiveness for your oversight. Your fiance should not just blame you, as he did approve them too.

Reply

victoria April 14, 2013 at 7:44 pm

seems the grroms family always gets deleted. never mind that the groom’s family has certain parts in the wedding, and never mind that if there was not a groom there would not be a wedding. if the bride’s family wants to pay for absolutely everything including the rehearsal dinner, then they have the right to omit the grooms family.

Reply

Bride Amanda April 24, 2013 at 3:48 pm

To not make anybody offended, I spoke to both families and they agreed that we just write, “We cordially invite you to….” and leave out the bride and groom’s family names of host’s and bride’s parents (mine are not here anymore) and cause confusion or issues. They agreed and it was as easy as that. It took up less space on the top of the invitation so we were able to write a short 3 line introduction we chose. It became peronal to both my fiance and I, and it doesnt have to be “traditional” and “proper” if you dont want it too. We have beautiful invites and nobody was offended, it was wonderful!

Reply

MindYourP's&Q's April 30, 2013 at 2:06 pm

The fact that this thread has been responded to time after time over 4 years shows that people are confused on this and it’s a touchy subject – regardless of what “should” or “shouldn’t” be done. You have two choices: 1) you either go the traditional route and follow Emily Post’s etiquette guidelines for that, or 2) you break tradition and you do what you think is best.

To the Groom’s Family:
It’d be nice if people would start assuming goodness in intentions of their family and their future in-laws – I laughed and then was disappointed in humanity when I read that a groom’s mother was sobbing over the phone when she wasn’t on the invitation. Really? It is what it is if the invitations have already gone out. Pick your battles and stop contributing to the drama. The couple have enough to worry about and wouldn’t you rather be in the planning process memory as a Sally-Solver instead of a Pammy-Problem? Thought so. Now stop being so suspicious that everyone is out to get you and no one cares about you because your name isn’t on the invitation.

To the Bride:
In my experience, the groom’s family seems to want to honor tradition when it’s convenient (e.g. only paying for the rehearsal dinner and expecting the bride’s family/couple to pick up the wedding tab – we’re probably talking a 1:10 ratio on cost here) and they don’t want to honor tradition when it doesn’t work in their favor (e.g. not being listed on the invitations, traveling to bride’s hometown for wedding, etc.). As long as they’re consistent in their values/outlook, don’t worry about it – at least you know what to expect. If they’re not, either call it out (not recommended) or don’t let it ruffle your feathers – keep planning/enjoying yourself and tell your fiance to deal with his Jekyll/Hyde family.

Here’s the bottom line: Have an honest conversation with BOTH families that this is YOUR wedding (i.e. the couple) and you two love them and will make the best decisions you can throughout the planning process. Confront the fact that they may not have the same opinion or agree with you on everything, but that you are asking for their support and understanding that, ultimately, this is your wedding and you will make the final decisions (unless they’re only giving you money if you do it their way and you can’t pony up the cost yourself). They will (probably) give it to you since it’s not in the context of a disagreement and may even commend this proactive approach. This will be important later on when stuff like this happens – and it will, no one is immune – and you calmly reference their pledge of support and understanding. “This is one of those times when we’ve done the best we can with what we have and we don’t have the same opinion. You promised your support and now is a time when we need it.”

Reply

For the the love of combining Families June 2, 2013 at 3:18 pm

Wow- We sure have become a world of Opera Singers! You know when a Bride and a Groom Marry it is about 2 individual becoming one and bringing along two different families. I read a few that it is the parents throwing a wedding for THEIR daughter and a self reliant man! Wow- Guess what That self reliant man was raised and reared by two parents and a family full of siblings too! Who is paying for what is not the issue. Brides parents host grooms parents birth and raised the invites should include a line son of and then the parents name always!!!!!!!!! I am disgusted at the vanity, selfishness, and plain entitlement in some of the above comments, even if the bride and groom are footing the bill for a first wedding I think that they should state both sets of parents- they are your parents who are excited to gain a new son or daughter along with the extended family. When did marriage become such a selfish act???????????????? Everyone these days just seems to want a party and to show off instead of focusing on what the real meaning of marriage is- the coming together of a man and a woman who want to share their life together? Good luck to all of you out there- Just a note I have never not once in the probably 200 plus wedding invitations our family has received “NOT” seen both sets of parents on the invitation!!!!!!!!!!!!! Even the non religious ones.

Reply

Tania June 29, 2013 at 9:04 am

After my husband and I have supported our son every minute of his life, as well as our extended family, financially and lovingly we are to find out that we are not listed on the
wedding invitation at all. We are also contributing substantially financially to the wedding most likely much more than the brides parents. This is very, very hurtful.
It is like we do not exist. Brides and their parents should realize that the grooms family are inviting family and friends also and it appears that the grooms family is not supporting the event.
Why are the brides parents more important in the wedding?
In days gone, it was true that only the brides parents paid for the wedding. And it was tradition that invitations were written as such. That is no longer the case and I do believe that the grooms parents should be recognized even if they are not contributing any money. It should not be about the money.
So for all you future brides out there, do consider the feelings of others, it is not only
your day but the grooms also and he grew up with loving parents who brought him
up, to your benefit, to be the wonderful person he is today.

Reply

Elizabeth July 1, 2013 at 10:07 am

That’s a very sad situation, and I can sympathize with your anger/hurt/frustration. I wonder if it would have been better to be more explicit when discussing the wedding plans with your son (and his fiancee) that you had some expectations along with your contributions. I’m sure you simply assumed that you would be listed on the invitations. At this point, it sounds like what’s done is done. You may want to let your son know how you feel. They very likely omitted you out of a blind faith in ‘tradition’, and don’t know that they’ve inadvertently slighted you. In any case, I hope you can find it in yourself to resolve or overlook this, and don’t let it fester, so that you can enjoy your son’s wedding and take pride in the fact that you did raise him well.

Reply

Lisa July 9, 2013 at 11:19 am

I think both parents should be on the invite. Because without the other person wouldn’t be around for you to marry.

Reply

Ernie September 30, 2013 at 12:22 am

Hello,

I am putting together our wedding invitations currently.

At the moment we have the wording as the below:

Mother and Father of the bride
warmly invite
Person X
to attend the marriage of thier Daughter
Bride
to Groom
Son of Mother and father of the groom

My parents are paying for 80% of the wedding, with the grooms parents kindly paying for the drinks bill.

My financees parents have told us that they want to be listed at the top of the invite along with my parents.

I dont want to take anything away from the contributions that my folks have put in, but dont want to upset my future inlaws.

Personally I wanted to keep it traditional and structure the invite as how I have it listed above.

Help!

Reply

Elizabeth September 30, 2013 at 9:21 am

It sounds like the groom’s parents want to be listed along with your parents as the ‘hosts’ of this event. It makes sense – you will presumably invite half from your side and half from his side, and just as your parents will invite your side on your behalf, they want to be listed such that they are inviting their side on their son’s behalf. It is not “untraditional” to list both sets of parents at the top. There are many many ways of writing the invitation text. I would advise you to look through some of them and see if you can’t find a wording that suits everyone. It would not be “taking anything away” from your parents to list both sets at the outset. I believe my own wedding invitations were worded something like this, just for example:

Mary and Bob Smith
and
Carrie and George Black
request the honor of your presence at the wedding of their children

Lindsay Smith
and
David Black

at 6:00p on Saturday June 19 etc etc etc

I would consult with your fiance to see how he would like to proceed, it seems like he should have an opinion on this as well.

Reply

Jessica October 4, 2013 at 6:26 pm

I have a bit of a tricky situation myself. My fiancé and I both have a deceased parent. We both agreed that somehow we want their names on the invite as well. I’ve seen where you can put

Mr. John Smith and the late Mrs. Jane Smith.

My problem is my father is remarried, and I want to include my stepmother as well. How in the world do I do this?

Please help me!!

Reply

Elizabeth October 5, 2013 at 12:33 pm

Jessica, while I certainly understand the sentiment behind your desire to include your deceased parents in your wedding, unfortunately deceased people cannot “invite” or “host.” Only the living can do that. The invitation is not the right venue for a remembrance of your parents. A better idea would be to have a toast in their name, or someone as a part of the ceremony can offer a prayer for those would could not be there, and you can include a line or two about them in the program if you have one.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: